|
HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES WITH RISK ANALYSISBy V.R. Schneider and K.V. WilsonCONTENTS Introduction Mechanics of study Design philosophy Design discharge The base flood Freeboard Economic analysis Risk analysis Definition Usefulness of risk analysis Procedure The report Report outline Introduction Acknowledgment Purpose Project description Data collection Flood plain and channel geometry Land use Hydraulic and hydrologic data Geologic data Surface geology Channel morphology Soils information Scour history Cost data Capital cost Backwater damage Traffic interruption Embankment repairs Data analyses Magnitude and frequency of floods Hydrographs Natural water-surface profiles Flow distribution Special considerations Alternative bridges considered in risk analysis Water-surface profiles Risk analysis Summary and conclusions Summary References Appendix A - Example Report - Leaf River near Collins, MS Appendix B - Example Report - Leaf River near Hattiesburg, MS FIGURES 1. Graph showing the variation of expected cost with exceedance probability 2. Graphs showing a summary of the results of the risk analysis and the selection of the design discharge, bridge length, and embankment elevation 3. Graph showing the variation of construction costs with bridge length and embankment height 4. Graph showing the variation of backwater damage with bridge length and embankment height 5. Graph showing the variation of traffic interruption costs with bridge length and embankment height 6. Graph showing the variation of erosion damage potential with bridge length and embankment height 7. Graph showing the variation of design discharge with bridge length and embankment height TABLES 1. Summary of the risk analysis for one bridge length and embankment elevation 2. Typical report outline 3. Summary of typical data collected during a land-use survey ABSTRACT This maual presents example studies and reports which implement the philosophy that the total stream crossing including the approack fills in the flood plains and all necessary waterway openings should be designed and constructed for the least total expected cost to the public. The total expected cost includes the capital investment in the highway, expected replacement and repair costs as a result costs as a result of flood damages, expected user costs from traffic interruption and detour, and expected backwater drainages during the service life of the highway. Techniques for making engineering and economic studies for the least cost designs are presented along with suggestions for managing the time and work required for such studies. A unique design flood is defined for each bridge as the flood whose upstream stage is equal to the lowest elevation of the approach fill or bridge deck. Two example reports were prepared to illustrate the application of the method to a rural site (low backwater damage) and an urban site (high potential traffic interruption and backwater damage). ![]() LizardTech's Djvu plug-in is needed to view these reports. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE ENTIRE REPORT For questions or comments, contact K. Van Wilson. |